UCAT Decision Making: Inference Questions – Basics & Mastery Guide
Understanding UCAT Decision Making Inference Questions
In the Decision Making (DM) section of the UCAT, you’ll encounter a mix of question formats. Among these are the inference questions, which present a scenario and require you to evaluate multiple statements as either Yes or No. In simple terms, an inference question gives you information (which could be a short text passage, a chart, table, or diagram) and then asks whether certain conclusions “follow” from that information. You must decide for each given statement whether it is definitely true (Yes) or not necessarily true (No) based on the provided data or text.
Format: An inference question typically has a stimulus (a paragraph or data set) and five statements to judge. You respond by selecting “Yes” or “No” for each statement. These are also called “Yes/No statements” in the UCAT DM section.
Timing: The Decision Making subtest contains 35 questions in 37 minutes. Inference questions can be more time-consuming, as you have to address five sub-questions in one scenario. However, treat the five statements as one unit – all five must be answered within roughly a minute or so, meaning you need to work efficiently. Overall, DM timing averages about 64 seconds per question (since some questions are quicker single-answer ones, you can spend a bit more time on inference questions if needed).
Scoring: Each set of five Yes/No statements is worth up to 2 marks. You earn 2 marks if all five responses are correct, or 1 mark for a partially correct set (usually meaning 4 out of 5 correct). There’s no negative marking, so it’s always better to guess than to leave blanks.
Why these questions? Inference questions assess your ability to interpret information and draw logical conclusions – a vital skill for doctors and dentists who must make decisions from data and evidence. By practising these, you not only prepare for the UCAT but also build reasoning skills for your future career, where you’ll often need to analyse charts, research findings or case details and decide what logically follows.
🔴 Live UCAT Course – Limited Places Available
The UCAT is competitive — your preparation shouldn’t be.
Join our live, expert-led UCAT course and get real-time guidance to boost your score, build confidence, and secure medical or dental interviews.
Why students choose Blue Peanut:
- Live teaching with opportunities to ask questions
- UCAT-focused strategies that actually work
- Clear, step-by-step guidance for every UCAT section
- Built by doctors & admissions experts
- Trusted by students applying to top UK medical & dental schools
👉 Places on our live UCAT course are limited.
Book now to secure your spot and stay ahead of the competition.
Yes or No? The Logic Behind Inference Questions
Inference questions boil down to a logical decision: does the statement have to be true given the information (Yes), or is it not necessarily true or outright false given the info (No)? Understanding this binary logic is critical:
“Yes” (Definitely True): Mark a statement Yes only if you are certain it must be true based on the given passage or data. In other words, the information directly supports or implies the statement in all cases. If the statement is a logical consequence of the facts, then it’s a valid inference (Yes). For example, if a passage states that “All X are Y”, the conclusion “This particular X is Y” would definitely be true – select Yes ✅.
“No” (Not Supported or False): If a statement is not guaranteed by the information, choose No. This covers two possibilities: (1) the statement could be true but isn’t certain (there’s not enough info to say 100% – in UCAT Decision Making, treat any uncertainty as a No); or (2) the statement is definitely false or contradicts the given info (obviously No). For instance, if a chart shows a trend from 2010–2020 and a statement makes a claim about 2025 (beyond the provided data), that statement could be true but we can’t be sure – thus, it’s a No. Likewise, if a passage directly contradicts a statement, that’s a clear No ❌.
Key principle: “Could be true” is not enough for a Yes in DM inference questions. Unlike the Verbal Reasoning section (which has “True/False/Can’t Tell”), here you have only Yes or No options. There is no “Maybe” or “Can’t Tell” option. If a statement is even remotely unsure or requires an assumption, you must mark it as No. This is a crucial difference – many candidates mistakenly want to say “maybe” or feel something is likely true. But unless it’s definitely proven by the text/data, the correct answer is No.
Example: Imagine the info says, “In 2024, Dr. Smith saw 30 patients per day on average.” One statement reads, “Dr. Smith saw 30 patients on 1st March 2024.” We actually don’t know the exact number on that specific day – 30 per day is an average. It could be true that it was 30 on that day, but it could have been 28 or 32. Since it’s not guaranteed, you must answer No (it’s not definitively supported). This highlights how something plausible is marked No because it’s not certain.
Typical answer patterns: In official UCAT questions, it’s uncommon for all five statements to be “Yes” or all five “No.” Usually, out of the five statements, about 2 or 3 will be Yes, and the rest No. Fully extreme cases (5 Yes or 5 No) are rare (though 4 of one type can happen occasionally). Don’t use this as a strict rule, but it’s a helpful observation. If you find yourself wanting to answer “Yes” to all five statements, double-check you haven’t been too generous in your inferences. Conversely, if you think all are “No,” ensure you’re not missing an obvious true statement. The test usually mixes them up. That said, answer each statement on its own merits – there’s no requirement for a set number of Yes answers. It’s just a pattern to be aware of, not a strategy in itself.
Step-by-Step Strategy to Tackle Inference Questions
Facing a dense block of text or a complex chart can be intimidating. The key is to break the task down and tackle one statement at a time. Here’s a proven step-by-step approach:
Read the Stimulus Quickly: First, skim the given information (the passage or data) to get a general sense of the topic and what form the information takes (e.g. is it a scientific blurb, a news snippet, a table of figures, etc.). Don’t get bogged down in details yet – just note the context. For example, note what the chart is measuring, or the scenario described in a paragraph. This 5–10 second skim gives you orientation.
Focus on the First Statement: Now read the first statement (the first of the five conclusions). Do not try to memorize all five at once; handle them one by one. Focusing on one statement keeps you from being overwhelmed.
Locate Relevant Info: Search the stimulus for evidence related to that statement. This might mean finding a key word or data point that the statement mentions. For instance, if the statement says “Quokkas outnumber wallabies in Area 2” (from a data table scenario), find “Area 2” in the table and compare the numbers of quokkas and wallabies. If the statement is textual (“Conclusion: X is true”), scan the passage for X or related content. This step is essentially comparing the statement to the text/data.
Decide Yes or No Immediately: Based on the comparison, decide if the statement is definitely supported. Use the logic from the previous section – if it must be true given the info, select Yes; if not, select No. It helps to phrase it in your mind as: “Does the information guarantee this statement?” If you have to hesitate or speculate, it’s a No. Drag and drop (or mark) your answer straight away before moving on. This prevents confusion or forgetting to answer (a common mistake under time pressure).
Repeat for Each Statement: Move to the next statement and repeat the process. Treat each one independently – the answer for one statement doesn’t directly affect the others. By the time you’ve done all five, you’ll have answered Yes/No for each statement in that scenario. Then you can submit that question and continue to the next UCAT question.
Why one-at-a-time? It’s tempting to read all five statements first, but that can overload your short-term memory and cause you to mix up information. Handling them one by one ensures you stay focused and accurate. Moreover, not all statements will refer to the same part of the info – jumping around without a plan wastes time. Stick to a systematic approach: read statement -> find info -> answer -> next.
Use minimal data needed: An insight for efficiency – you often don’t need to parse the entire passage or chart fully. Just zero in on the piece of information relevant to the current statement. For example, if Statement 3 is about “2022 revenue”, you might only need the 2022 column of a table. Don’t get distracted by unrelated figures. Marks come from judging statements correctly, not from comprehending every detail of the stimulus. You can ignore parts of the data until a statement makes them relevant.
Finally, if you’re unsure on a statement, make your best guess (Yes or No) and flag the question. You can revisit it if time permits. But never leave it blank – there’s no penalty for guessing, and you might get partial credit even if one statement is wrong.
Top Tips for Mastering Inference Questions
Mastering inference questions is about both accuracy and speed. Here are some top tips – think of these as your do’s ✅ and don’ts ❌ for Yes/No statement questions:
An example of visual data in a Decision Making question. Always check the axes, units, and labels carefully when interpreting charts or tables. In inference questions, examiners often include tricky details: for example, a graph might show data “per month” but a statement asks about “per year” – requiring you to multiply accordingly. Misreading units or time frames can lead to incorrect answers, so pay close attention to details.
✅ Use Only the Given Information: Base your decision solely on the info provided in the stimulus. Do not bring in outside knowledge or assumptions. Even if the topic is familiar (e.g. a medical fact you learned in class), the UCAT isn’t testing your factual knowledge here – it’s testing reasoning. Pretend you know nothing beyond what’s in front of you. For instance, if the passage is about an imaginary species or uses made-up terms, just use the internal logic given. Suspend your own beliefs and focus on the text/data. If a statement introduces something not mentioned in the info, it cannot be concluded – mark it No.
✅ Pay Attention to Wording: Tiny words can flip a statement’s truth. Watch for qualifiers and absolutes: all, none, some, only, always, never, at least, more than, etc.. Inference questions love to exploit these. For example, the info might say “most of X have property Y,” but a statement says “All X have Y.” That’s a trap – “most” does not guarantee “all,” so the statement is No. Conversely, if the info says “all”, then any statement weakening it to “some” would actually still be true (if all are, then certainly some are – though usually they test the other direction). Be literal: if the wording doesn’t match, the conclusion likely doesn’t follow.
✅ Check Every Detail in Data: When dealing with tables, graphs, or charts, read titles, labels, units, and legends carefully. Many mistakes happen by misreading the scale or ignoring a note. If a table is titled “Average monthly expenditure (in thousands of £)”, and a statement gives a number not scaled, convert units as needed. If a graph’s x-axis is years and one year is missing a bar, maybe that year had no data – don’t assume a trend continues. Also be cautious with comparisons: ensure you’re comparing the correct categories the statement mentions (e.g. “Region A had a higher value than Region B in 2020” – check 2020 for both A and B explicitly). The test creators often put distracting data points; focus only on the relevant ones for each statement.
✅ Be Critical of Explanations: Sometimes a statement will offer a reason or explanation for a trend observed in the data (e.g. “The decrease in 2011 was due to X happening”). Even if the data shows a decrease in 2011, ask yourself: Did the passage or data tell us why? If not, that causal explanation is not supported. Inference questions rarely expect you to identify why something happened – they just ask if it follows. So, any statement that goes beyond the given facts (by adding an explanation or extra scenario) is usually a No. Don’t read your own logic into it – stick to what’s given.
✅ Use the Calculator and Noteboard if Needed: You’ll have an on-screen calculator and a note board/rough paper in the test. For inference questions, heavy calculation is uncommon, but basic arithmetic might be needed (sums, differences, percentages). If a statement requires a quick calculation (e.g. computing a percentage increase from 1987 to 2022 in a graph), do it confidently – approximate if needed by rounding. If numbers are large or you need to double-check, don’t shy from using the calculator. Just beware of spending too long; most calculations can be simplified. For example, estimate or round off numbers to see if a statement’s claim is reasonable. If a chart shows ~900 and ~2100 and the statement says “increased by roughly 135%,” you can quickly compute (2100–900)/900 ≈ 133% – that’s close enough, so Yes in that case. Quick estimation can save time over precise math, and it’s usually sufficient for the answers.
✅ Practice Reading Speed and Precision: Inference questions straddle verbal reasoning and data interpretation. Work on quickly reading a paragraph for key facts, and scanning a chart for the needed figures. It’s a skill that improves with practice. Time yourself with practice questions to simulate the pressure. The more you practise, the faster you’ll get at recognizing exactly what each statement is testing (e.g. an “all vs some” logic, a specific data point, a trend, etc.). Being familiar with common patterns will make you more efficient.
Now some Don’ts / Pitfalls to avoid:
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Even with the best strategies, certain traps can trip you up. Be mindful of these common mistakes students make on DM inference questions:
❌ Assuming “Plausible” Means Yes: Just because a statement sounds likely or reasonable, doesn’t mean it’s supported by the given information. The examiners often include statements that are true in real-world context or could be true, but the key is whether the test info confirms it. If it’s not explicitly or logically derived from the info, it’s a No. For example, a passage about a new drug might lead you to think of general medical knowledge, but if the passage doesn’t state something, you cannot infer it. Stick to the info like a lawyer with evidence – speculation, no matter how sensible, gets a “No” verdict.
❌ Not Reading the Whole Statement Carefully: Under time pressure, you might skim a statement and catch some familiar keywords, then rush to answer. This is risky – a single word like “not” or “only” can flip the meaning. Always read the statement in full and make sure you understand it before deciding. If a statement is worded in a confusing way (double negatives, etc.), rephrase it in simpler terms. For instance, “It is not the case that none of the data were updated” – better to translate that mentally to “Some of the data were updated.” Taking a second to parse the statement can save you from a silly mistake.
❌ Getting Bogged Down in Data: Some inference questions present a lot of information – a busy graph or a long paragraph – more than you likely need. A big mistake is trying to comprehend every detail before looking at the statements. Remember, you’re not writing a report on the data; you’re just verifying specific statements. Use the one-statement-at-a-time approach. If you find yourself reading background info not asked about by any statement, you’re wasting precious time. Trust that each statement will guide you to the piece of info you need. If a particular statement requires digging through a complex figure and you’re taking too long, consider flagging the question, take an educated guess on that statement, and move on – but keep momentum. Don’t let one sub-question eat up your time for the whole section.
❌ Changing Answers on a Hunch: It’s fine to review if you have time, but avoid second-guessing yourself without a clear reason. Often your first logical judgement is correct. Many students fall into the trap of “Maybe they wanted the other answer…” and start doubting. Only change an answer if, upon careful review, you find new evidence or realize a misread. Randomly flipping Yes to No at the last minute (or vice versa) can turn a correct answer into a wrong one. Be confident in your method: if you followed the evidence and your rules (must be true vs not sure), your initial answer is likely right.
❌ Leaving Blanks: This is an absolute no-go – never leave any statement unanswered. Even if you have no clue, you have a 50/50 chance by guessing. There’s no negative marking, so an educated (or even random) guess is better than nothing. This also applies if you run out of time: ensure every statement has either Yes or No selected. An unanswered question is 0% chance of a mark; a guess at least gives you some chance. And who knows, your intuition might be more accurate than you think!
❌ Stressing Over Distribution: As mentioned, typically a mix of Yes and No is expected. But a pitfall is to force an answer to fit a pattern (“Hmm, I’ve already put 3 Yes, maybe the rest must be No?”). Each statement stands alone. Don’t override evidence just to make your answers look “balanced.” The test makers can and will mix it unpredictably. Trust your analysis for each statement. If you end up with an uncommon distribution (like 4 Yes/1 No or 4 No/1 Yes), so be it – it can happen. It’s better to be right on four and uncertain on one than to deliberately flip one correct answer just to meet an imagined quota of Yes’s.
Final Thoughts: Practise and Confidence 🙌
Inference questions can initially seem daunting – they draw on skills from both Verbal Reasoning (careful reading and inference) and Quantitative Reasoning (interpreting data) all under time pressure. The good news is that with practice, you will see patterns in how these questions are structured. Work through plenty of practice questions and review explanations to understand why a given statement is Yes or No. Over time, you’ll develop an almost instinctual sense for what must be true versus what’s a stretch.
Keep the following in mind as you prepare:
Use Official Resources: The UCAT Consortium’s official question banks and practice tests are excellent for getting used to the style. They will show you authentic question phrasing and timings. Also, check if the official site or your prep provider has a tutorial specifically on Decision Making strategies – these often reiterate the principles we’ve discussed (using logic, not outside knowledge, etc.).
Targeted Practice: If inference (interpreting information) questions are a weak area, isolate that question type in your prep and drill it. Many UCAT prep platforms (e.g. Medify, Medistudents’ Medibuddy, etc.) allow you to practise by sub-question type. This can help you focus on improving the specific skill of comparing statements to data.
Simulate Test Conditions: When comfortable, practise doing a set of inference questions under timed conditions, and eventually a full Decision Making section. Train yourself to move swiftly yet carefully through statements. The goal is to make the process almost mechanical: read, find, decide, next… You’ll gain speed as you reduce indecision.
Review Mistakes: For any practice question you get wrong, dig into why. Did you misread something? Fall for a trick wording? Not find the right piece of data? Your mistakes will usually fall into the categories we discussed. By identifying them, you can adjust your approach (maybe you realize you often miss negative words, so you’ll double-check for those). Each error is a chance to improve before the real exam.
By building these habits, you’ll enter the exam with confidence. Remember, many candidates find Decision Making challenging – but that’s exactly why mastering it can give you an edge. With our basics covered and these strategies in hand, you can turn the Yes/No inference questions from a potential stumbling block into an opportunity to boost your score. Good luck, and happy practising! 🎉
References and Further Reading
UCAT Consortium – Test Format and Scoring (Official) – Overview of the UCAT subtests, including Decision Making format and marking scheme.
UCAT Official Preparation Plan & Question Banks – (via UCAT official site) Practice materials that allow you to apply these strategies on realistic questions. Regular practice here can reinforce the techniques outlined above.
